検索対象:     
報告書番号:
※ 半角英数字
 年 ~ 
 年

放射性セシウム捕捉ポテンシャルから推定される$$K$$$$_{rm d}$$値と実測$$K$$$$_{rm d}$$値との誤差要因の解明

Mineralogical factors causing underestimation of $$K$$$$_{rm d}$$ values calculated from radiocesium interception potential

宇野 功一郎*; 中尾 淳*; 奥村 雅彦   ; 山口 瑛子  ; 小暮 敏博*; 矢内 純太*

Uno, Koichiro*; Nakao, Atsushi*; Okumura, Masahiko; Yamaguchi, Akiko; Kogure, Toshihiro*; Yanai, Junta*

土壌のセシウム(Cs)吸着能の定量指標としてRadiocesium interception potential (RIP)が広く用いられてきたが、このRIPが実環境でのCsの分配係数($$K$$$$_{rm d}$$)と必ずしも相関しないことがわかってきた。この原因を明らかにするため、より実環境に則した溶液を用いた$$K$$$$_{rm d}$$測定やRIPとの比較、鉱物の構造評価を行った。その結果、カリウムイオンやアンモニウムイオンなどの競合陽イオンの濃度が重要であることや、鉱物自体の構造変化が重要であることがわかった。

Radiocesium interception potential (RIP) has been widely used as a quantitative indicator of cesium (Cs) adsorption capacity of soil, but it has been found that RIP does not always correlate with the distribution coefficient ($$K$$$$_{rm d}$$) of Cs in the actual environment. In order to clarify the cause of this discrepancy, we measured Kd using more realistic solutions, compared it with RIP, and evaluated the mineral structure. As a result, it was found that the concentration of competing cations, such as potassium and ammonium ions, and the structural change of the mineral itself are important.

Access

:

- Accesses

InCites™

:

Altmetrics

:

[CLARIVATE ANALYTICS], [WEB OF SCIENCE], [HIGHLY CITED PAPER & CUP LOGO] and [HOT PAPER & FIRE LOGO] are trademarks of Clarivate Analytics, and/or its affiliated company or companies, and used herein by permission and/or license.