検索対象:     
報告書番号:
※ 半角英数字
 年 ~ 
 年

炭素循環製鉄のAspen Plusによるモデル化とシステム全体の評価

Evaluation of active carbon recycling energy system for ironmaking process by modeling with Aspen Plus

林 健太郎*; 鈴木 克樹*; 栗原 孝平*; 中垣 隆雄*; 笠原 清司  

Hayashi, Kentaro*; Suzuki, Katsuki*; Kurihara, Kohei*; Nakagaki, Takao*; Kasahara, Seiji

炭素循環製鉄の化学プロセスシミュレータAspen Plusによるモデル化と、システム全体のCO$$_{2}$$排出量、エクセルギー消費量評価を行った。CO再生法として、CO$$_{2}$$電解と、HTGR-ISプロセスで製造したH$$_{2}$$との逆シフト反応(RWGS)によるCO$$_{2}$$還元を検討した。CO$$_{2}$$還元プロセスでは、RWGS平衡を保つために化学量論比よりも多量のH$$_{2}$$が投入され、未消費H$$_{2}$$は高炉で鉄鉱石還元に使われる。そのため、CO$$_{2}$$還元プロセスの方がCO$$_{2}$$排出削減幅が大きくなるものの、エクセルギー消費量も大きくなった。CO$$_{2}$$電解プロセスでは、BFG循環率, CO$$_{2}$$還元率の上昇により炭素循環量が増大し、CO$$_{2}$$排出量は削減されるものの、電解電力増大のために、後者ではエクセルギー消費量が大きくなった。

Evaluation of active carbon recycling energy system for ironmaking process by modeling with Aspen Plus was carried out by CO$$_{2}$$ emission and exergy consumption. The investigated CO recovery methods were CO$$_{2}$$ electrolysis and CO$$_{2}$$ reduction in reverse water gas shift reaction (RWGS) using H$$_{2}$$ made in the HTGR-IS process. More H$$_{2}$$ than stoichiometric amonut was required to keep RWGS equilibrium and H$$_{2}$$ not used in RWGS was consumed by iron ore reduction in the BF. Though CO$$_{2}$$ decrease was more in CO$$_{2}$$ reduction process, exergy consumption was larger. CO$$_{2}$$ decrease was larger in higher BFG circulation ratio and CO$$_{2}$$ reduction ratio due to more carbon recycle. Exergy consumption was large in the higher reduction ratio because of more electricity consumption.

Access

:

- Accesses

InCites™

:

Altmetrics

:

[CLARIVATE ANALYTICS], [WEB OF SCIENCE], [HIGHLY CITED PAPER & CUP LOGO] and [HOT PAPER & FIRE LOGO] are trademarks of Clarivate Analytics, and/or its affiliated company or companies, and used herein by permission and/or license.