原子力施設廃止措置費用簡易評価コード(DECOST)の改良

Improvement of the Simplified Decommissioning Cost Estimation Code for Nuclear Facilities (DECOST)

高橋 信雄; 窪田 晋太郎; 瀧谷 啓晃 ; 阪場 亮祐*; 佐藤 公一; 志知 亮 

Takahashi, Nobuo; Kubota, Shintaro; Takiya, Hiroaki; Sakaba, Ryosuke*; Sato, Koichi; Shichi, Ryo

国立研究開発法人日本原子力研究開発機構(原子力機構)は、原子炉施設、再処理施設など多様な原子力施設を有している。役割を終えて老朽化した施設は、いずれ廃止措置を行うことになるが、廃止措置実施方針や廃止措置計画を立案する上で廃止措置費用を事前に評価する必要があることから、これまでに、施設の特徴や類似性、解体工法などを基に廃止措置費用を短時間で効率的に計算できる評価方法(DECOST)を開発した。DECOSTの開発以降も原子力施設の廃止措置が実施されており、新たな実績や知見が報告されているため、これらの知見をDECOSTに反映した。また、DECOST利用者のニーズを加味し、施設の解体費用を管理区域解除までにかかる費用と管理区域解除後の施設建屋の解体にかかる費用とに分割して評価できるようにDECOSTを改良した。本報告書は、DECOSTの改良に関する内容を報告するものであり、費用評価式に用いる評価係数の再設定の考え方並びに再設定後の評価係数の妥当性に関する考えを示した。また、改良により評価項目、評価内容を一部変更したため、改良したDECOSTの評価手順を掲載した。

The Japan Atomic Energy Agency has various nuclear facilities such as reactor facilities and reprocessing facilities. Some aged facilities will be decommissioned after their original functions ended, and it is necessary to evaluate their decommissioning cost to formulate the initial decommissioning plans and the final decommissioning plans. We have developed an evaluation method called DECOST that can efficiently calculate the decommissioning cost in a short time based on factors such as features and similarity of the facilities and dismantling methods. The decommissioning of nuclear facilities has been implemented and new achievements and findings have been reported since the development of DECOST. These findings were reflected in DECOST. In consideration of the needs of DECOST users, DECOST has been improved so that the cost of dismantling the facility can be divided into the cost of releasing the controlled area and the cost of dismantling the facility building after the release of the controlled area. This report shows the improvement of DECOST, the concept of resetting the evaluation coefficient used in the cost evaluation formula, and the validity of the evaluation coefficient after resetting. In addition, the evaluation procedure of the improved DECOST is described, since the evaluation items and evaluation contents were partially changed due to the improvement.