Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Tazaki, Makiko; Shimizu, Ryo; Kimura, Takashi; Suda, Kazunori
JAEA-Review 2024-041, 88 Pages, 2024/11
JAEA-Review-2024-041.pdf:2.83MB
As part of the "Research on factor analysis and technical processes for achieving denuclearization", Investigation and analysis on Iran's nuclear development and denuclearization was conducted. Before Islamic Revolution, Iran pursued nuclear weapon related programs, however, the program was temporarily halted due to the Revolution. On the other hand, during the Iran-Iraq War, Iran was attacked by chemical weapons from Iraq, and it could not receive the response it wanted from the international community, so the Iran decided to pursue secret nuclear weapon program. In 2002, Iranian dissidents exposed Iran's clandestine nuclear activities, so the Iran seemed to have focused more on maintaining its uranium enrichment activities, rather than developing nuclear weapons. Since then, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom have been working to resolve the Iran's nuclear issues through diplomatic negotiations. In 2006, the US, Russia and PRC joined negotiations and in 2015, an agreement was reached with Iran as "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)". The lessons learned from Iran's denuclearization are that there are needs for momentum toward denuclearization in the international community as well as concord and cooperation among the five nuclear-weapon states. In addition, not only the effective use of sanctions including the clear condition of its lifting, but also keeping guarantees for the peaceful use of nuclear energy should not be undermined.
Tamai, Hiroshi; Tazaki, Makiko; Shimizu, Ryo; Kimura, Takashi; Nakatani, Takayoshi; Suda, Kazunori
JAEA-Review 2021-073, 19 Pages, 2022/03
JAEA-Review-2021-073.pdf:1.51MB
As a part of "Research on Factor Analysis and Technical Process for Achieving Denuclearisation", investigation on Libya's cases of nuclear development and denuclearisation, and analysis of its characteristics have been conducted. Libya had been suspected that dictator Qadaffi had an interest in the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) since early 1970s after his revolution. US and UK intelligence were focusing on Libya's situation; however, actual status was not revealed for a long time. In 1980s, Libya faced to economic exhaustion due to sanctions from the international community against Libya's supporting terrorism. Libya decided to abandon WMD development and its denuclearisation in early 2000s. Several factors to prompt Libya's decisions can be highlighted; economic sanctions; witnessing regime collapse of President Hussein due to Iraq War who aimed at WMD; revealing secret procurement of centrifuge equipment through the inspection of German-flagged ships by US. Libya's denuclearisation was rapidly implemented to prevent Libya from reverting to nuclear development through well-coordinated roles among main players, quick decisions by Libyan side, and warning effect of Iraqi case. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) played a central role in the verification of all related facilities and activities in Libya. Through safeguards activities beyond those permitted by Additional Protocol (AP), IAEA evaluated the whole Libya's nuclear programme. The denuclearisation was successfully completed by removal of nuclear materials and related equipment from Libya. It was also revealed that Libya's technological capabilities had not well developed to utilize procured materials and equipment. Libya's case is regarded in the international community as a good practice of denuclearisation. On the other hand, Qadaffi administration was overthrown by the democratisation movement that occurred after denuclearisation. It might be understood as a miserable end