Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Andel, B.*; Andreyev, A. N.; Antalic, S.*; Barzakh, A.*; Bree, N.*; Cocolios, T. E.*; Comas, V. F.*; Diriken, J.*; Elseviers, J.*; Fedorov, D. V.*; et al.
Physical Review C, 96(5), p.054327_1 - 054327_11, 2017/12
Times Cited Count:3 Percentile:25.23(Physics, Nuclear)Devaraja, H. M.*; Heinz, S.*; Beliuskina, O.*; Comas, V. F.*; Hofmann, S.*; Hornung, C.*; Mnzenberg, G.*; Nishio, Katsuhisa; Ackermann, D.*; Gambhir, Y. K.*; et al.
Physics Letters B, 748, p.199 - 203, 2015/09
Times Cited Count:72 Percentile:96.74(Astronomy & Astrophysics)Elseviers, J.*; Andreyev, A. N.*; Huyse, M.*; Van Duppen, P.*; Antalic, S.*; Barzakh, A.*; Bree, N.*; Cocolios, T. E.*; Comas, V. F.*; Diriken, J.*; et al.
Physical Review C, 88(4), p.044321_1 - 044321_13, 2013/10
Times Cited Count:40 Percentile:88.55(Physics, Nuclear)Nishio, Katsuhisa; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Aritomo, Yoshihiro*; Comas, V. F.*; Dllmann, Ch. E.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; He
berger, F. P.*; et al.
AIP Conference Proceedings 1524, p.68 - 72, 2013/04
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Physics, Nuclear)Hofmann, S.*; Heinz, S.*; Mann, R.*; Maurer, J.*; Khuyagbaatar, J.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Barth, B.*; Block, M.*; Burkhard, H. G.*; et al.
European Physical Journal A, 48(5), p.62_1 - 62_23, 2012/05
Times Cited Count:176 Percentile:98.81(Physics, Nuclear)Nishio, Katsuhisa; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Aritomo, Yoshihiro; Comas, V. F.*; Dllmann, Ch. E.*; Gorshkov, A.*; Graeger, R.*; et al.
EPJ Web of Conferences, 17, p.09005_1 - 09005_4, 2011/10
Times Cited Count:2 Percentile:63.74(Physics, Nuclear)Andreyev, A. N.*; Elseviers, J.*; Huyse, M.*; Van Duppen, P.*; Antalic, S.*; Barzakh, A.*; Bree, N.*; Cocolios, T. E.*; Comas, V. F.*; Diriken, J.*; et al.
Physical Review Letters, 105(25), p.252502_1 - 252502_5, 2010/12
Times Cited Count:202 Percentile:97.27(Physics, Multidisciplinary)Khuyagbaatar, J.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Comas, V. F.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; Kindler, B.*; Kojouharov, I.*; Lommel, B.*; et al.
European Physical Journal A, 46(1), p.59 - 67, 2010/10
Times Cited Count:28 Percentile:81.08(Physics, Nuclear)Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Aritomo, Yoshihiro; Comas, V. F.*; D
llmann, Ch. E.*; Gorshkov, A.*; Graeger, R.*; et al.
Physical Review C, 82(2), p.024611_1 - 024611_9, 2010/08
Times Cited Count:83 Percentile:95.97(Physics, Nuclear)Heinz, S.*; Comas, V.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Burkhard, H. G.*; Gan, Z.*; Heredia, J.*; Khuyagbaatar, J.*; Kindler, B.*; et al.
European Physical Journal A, 38(2), p.227 - 232, 2008/11
Times Cited Count:24 Percentile:77.52(Physics, Nuclear)Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; et al.
Nuclear Physics A, 805(1-4), p.516 - 518, 2008/06
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; et al.
Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemical Sciences, 8(2), p.73 - 78, 2007/10
Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Burkhard, H. G.*; Comas, V. F.*; Dressler, R.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; Heberger, F. P.*; et al.
European Physical Journal A, 32(3), p.251 - 260, 2007/06
Times Cited Count:269 Percentile:99.67(Physics, Nuclear)Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; et al.
AIP Conference Proceedings 891, p.71 - 79, 2007/03
Seaborgium isotopes were produced in the fusion reaction Si +
U as evaporation residues (ERs), and the cross sections were determined. The experiment was carried out at GSI in Darmstadt, Germany. At the center-of-mass energy of E
= 144 MeV, three
decay chains starting from
Sg were observed, and the corresponding ER cross section was determined to be 67 pb. At the sub-barrier energy of E
= 133 MeV, three spontaneous fission events of a new isotope
Sg were detected. The cross section was 10 pb. The half-life of
Sg was determined to be 120 ms. The ER cross sections were compared with a statistical model calculation. In the fusion process, the coupled channel calculation taking into account the prolate deformation of
U was adopted to determine the capture cross section. The calculated capture cross section agrees well with the fission cross section of
Si +
U obtained at the JAEA tandem accelerator. The measured cross section of
Sg at the sub-barrier energy is factor 10
larger than the calculation based on the one-dimensional model in the fusion process, showing the fusion enhancement caused by the deformation of
U. However, disagreement with the calculation suggests the presence of quasi-fission channel. At the above barrier energy of E
= 144 MeV, the measured cross section is well reproduced by the calculation. This means that the interaction of
Si at the equotorial side of
U has advantage on the fusion process.
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; et al.
European Physical Journal A, 29(3), p.281 - 287, 2006/09
Times Cited Count:66 Percentile:93.95(Physics, Nuclear)Seaborgium isotopes were produced in the fusion reaction Si +
U as evaporation residues (ERs), and the cross sections were determined. The experiment was carried out at GSI in Darmstadt, Germany. At the center-of-mass energy of E
= 144 MeV, three
decay chains starting from
Sg were observed, and the corresponding ER cross section was determined to be 67 pb. At the sub-barrier energy of E
= 133 MeV, three spontaneous fission events of a new isotope
Sg were detected. The cross section was 10 pb. The half-life of
Sg was determined to be 120 ms. The ER cross sections were compared with a statistical model calculation. In the fusion process, the coupled channel calculation taking into account the prolate deformation of
U was adopted to determine the capture cross section. The calculaed capture cross section agrees well with the fission cross section of
Si +
U obtained at the JAEA tandem accelerator. The measured cross section of
Sg at the sub-barrier energy is factor 10
larger than the calculation based on the one-dimensional model in the fusion process, showing the fusion enhancement caused by the deformation of
U. However, disagreement with the calculation suggests the presence of quasi-fission channel. At the above barrier energy of E
= 144 MeV, the measured cross section is well reproduced by the calculation. This means that the interaction of
Si at the equatorial side of
U has advantage on the fusion process.
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; D
llmann, Ch. E.*; Gorshkov, A.*; Graeger, R.*; Heinz, S.*; et al.
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Hirose, Kentaro; Nishio, Katsuhisa; Nishinaka, Ichiro; Makii, Hiroyuki; Ikezoe, Hiroshi*; Orlandi, R.; Lguillon, R.; Tsukada, Kazuaki; Asai, Masato; Nagame, Yuichiro; et al.
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Hofmann, S.*; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; Heredia, J. A.*; Heberger, F. P.*; et al.
no journal, ,
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Andreyev, A. N.*; Elseviers, J.*; Huyse, M.*; Van Duppen, P.*; Antalic, S.*; Barzakh, A.*; Bree, N.*; Cocolios, T. E.*; Comas, V. F.*; et al.
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Hofmann, S.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Aritomo, Yoshihiro; Comas, V. F.*; Dllmann, Ch. E.*; Gorshkov, A.*; Graeger, R.*; et al.
no journal, ,
Nishio, Katsuhisa; Mitsuoka, Shinichi; Ikezoe, Hiroshi; Hofmann, S.*; Heberger, F. P.*; Ackermann, D.*; Antalic, S.*; Comas, V. F.*; Gan, Z.*; Heinz, S.*; et al.
no journal, ,
Seaborgium isotopes were produced in the fusion reaction Si +
U as evaporation residues (ERs), and the cross sections were determined. The experiment was carried out at GSI in Darmstadt, Germany. At the center-of-mass energy of E
= 144 MeV, three
decay chains starting from
Sg were observed, and the corresponding ER cross section was determined to be 67 pb. At the sub-barrier energy of E
= 133 MeV, three spontaneous fission events of a new isotope
Sg were detected. The cross section was 10 pb. The half-life of
Sg was determined to be 120 ms. The ER cross sections were compared with a statistical model calculation. In the fusion process, the coupled channel calculation taking into account the prolate deformation of
U was adopted to determine the capture cross section. The calculated capture cross section agrees well with the fission cross section of
Si +
U obtained at the JAEA tandem accelerator. The measured cross section of
Sg at the sub-barrier energy is factor 10
larger than the calculation based on the one-dimensional model in the fusion process, showing the fusion enhancement caused by the deformation of
U. However, disagreement with the calculation suggests the presence of quasi-fission channel. At the above barrier energy of E
= 144 MeV, the measured cross section is well reproduced by the calculation. This means that the interaction of
Si at the equotorial side of
U has advantage on the fusion process.