Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Aoki, Kazuhiro; Imai, Hirotaro; Seshimo, Kazuyoshi; Kimura, Megumi; Kirita, Fumio; Nakanishi, Ryuji
JAEA-Research 2024-005, 177 Pages, 2024/10
JAEA-Research-2024-005.pdf:12.02MB
This study presents a method for evaluating displacements on active faults that lack clear markers of fault offset. The method uses geological surveys, core studies, and chemical analyses along with hydraulic and mechanical tests. We applied this method to three test sites along the Shionohira Fault (Shionohira and Betto sites) and the Kuruma Fault (Minakamikita site). Laboratory friction tests on the fault gouge using a variable-speed, rotating shear friction apparatus were conducted. The samples from the Shionohira and Betto sites showed velocity weakening or strengthening, but no velocity dependence was observed at the Minakamikita site. A small-scale test to induce fault slip was conducted using the SIMFIP method. At the Shionohira site, fault slip can be modeled as a Coulomb rupture and shows a frictional dependence on slip velocity. On the other hand, at the Minakamikita site, a complex response using multiple fractures and slip planes was observed. Based on the water pressure response, the hydraulic properties of the area between the faults were evaluated. The transmissivity and specific storage are larger at Shionohira than at Minakamikita. Fault slip data such as shear plane attitude or shear sense were obtained from core samples and stress inversion analysis was performed. We attempted to elucidate the history of the movement and stress that formed the fracture zone. The results reconstructed five activity stages at Shionohira site and two stages at Minakamikita site. As shown in this report, the frictional properties, fault rupture mode, hydraulic properties and the history of fault motion were found to be different between the Shionohira and Kuruma sites. However, the results are based on a few locational data, so case studies at other sites and more applications to other faults should be considered to improve the reliability of the evaluation.
Wakahama, Hiroshi*; Nojo, Haruka*; Aoki, Kazuhiro; Imai, Hirotaro; Guglielmi, Y.*; Cook, P.*; Soom, F.*
Oyo Chishitsu, 64(5), p.236 - 254, 2023/12
Upon the Hamadori earthquake (Mw 6.7) of 11 April 2011, coseismic surface deformation of 14 km running NNW to SSE in southeast Fukushima Prefecture occurred and was newly named the Shionohira Fault. However, no surface deformation was observed along the Kuruma Fault which is a southern extension of the Shionohira Fault. Fault injection tests using SIMFIP method at the Shionohira site on the former active segment and the Minakamikita site on the latter inactive segment were conducted to evaluate the activity of the two faults. Based on hydraulic responses to water injection into the fault rupture zone in the monitoring boreholes at the two sites, hydraulic properties of the area across the fault zone were estimated using the GRF model (Barker, 1988). The results obtained on hydraulic conductivity, specific storage and flow dimension were consistent with those in the domestic and international literature. The hydraulic conductivity and specific storage were larger in Shionohira than in Minakamikita. The flow dimension of Shionohira was three-dimensional, while that of Minakamikita was found to be a two-dimensional fractional flow. In addition, it is understood that the volumetric expansion occurs in the former site in the triaxial direction and the latter in the uniaxial with the comparison between the uniaxial expansion coefficient calculated from the results of SIMFIP displacement measurements and the specific storage in the hydraulic analysis. The difference in the hydraulic parameters between the two sites corresponded to the difference in the spatial development of fractures considered to be the "water passway," indicating the possibility of a correlation between the parameters and the different possible causes for fault activity at the two sites.
