Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Imbeaux, F.*; Citrin, J.*; Hobirk, J.*; Hogeweij, G. M. D.*; K
chl, F.*; Leonov, V. M.*; Miyamoto, Seiji; Nakamura, Yukiharu*; Parail, V.*; Pereverzev, G. V.*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 51(8), p.083026_1 - 083026_11, 2011/08
Times Cited Count：35 Percentile：81.02(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)Imbeaux, F.*; Basiuk, V.*; Budny, R.*; Casper, T.*; Citrin, J.*; Fereira, J.*; Fukuyama, Atsushi*; Garcia, J.*; Gribov, Y. V.*; Hayashi, Nobuhiko; et al.
Proceedings of 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2010) (CD-ROM), 8 Pages, 2011/03
Imbeaux, F.*; Basiuk, V.*; Budny, R.*; Casper, T.*; Citrin, J.*; Fereira, J.*; Fukuyama, Atsushi*; Garcia, J.*; Gribov, Y. V.*; Hayashi, Nobuhiko; et al.
Proceedings of 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2010) (CD-ROM), 8 Pages, 2010/10
In order to prepare adequate current ramp-up and ramp-down scenarios for ITER, present experiments from several tokamaks have been analyzed by means of integrated modeling in view of determining relevant heat transport models for these operation phases. The results of these studies are presented and projections to ITER current ramp-up and ramp-down scenarios are done, focusing on the baseline inductive scenario (main heating plateau current of 15 MA). Various transport models have been tested by means of integrated modeling against experimental data from ASDEX Upgrade, C-Mod, DIII-D, JET and Tore Supra, including both Ohmic plasmas and discharges with additional heating/current drive. With using the most successful models, projections to the ITER current ramp-up and ramp-down phases are carried out. Though significant differences between models appear on the electron temperature prediction, the final q-profiles reached in the simulation are rather close.
Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Shirai, Hiroshi; Urano, Hajime*; Takizuka, Tomonori; Kamada, Yutaka; Hatae, Takaki; Koide, Yoshihiko; Asakura, Nobuyuki; Fujita, Takaaki; Fukuda, Takeshi*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 43(1), p.30 - 39, 2003/01
Times Cited Count：28 Percentile：64.42(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)The stiffness of thermal transport in ELMy H-modes is explained in a series of carefully chosen JT-60U plasmas, and measured temperature are compared with the predictions of several transport models. A heating power scan with constant Tped, a scan of pedestal temperature Tped with constant heating power, and an on/off-axis heating comparison are presented. Predictions of the RLWB and IFS/PPPL models generally agree with the measured temperature outside 
0.3
, but the Multimode model uniformly predicts temperatures that are too high except in the central region.
Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Shirai, Hiroshi; Asakura, Nobuyuki; Fujita, Takaaki; Fukuda, Takeshi; Hatae, Takaki; Ide, Shunsuke; Isayama, Akihiko; Kamada, Yutaka; Kawano, Yasunori; et al.
IAEA-CN-77 (CD-ROM), 5 Pages, 2001/05
no abstracts in English
Boucher, D.*; Connor, J. W.*; Houlberg, W. A.*; Turner, M. F.*; Bracco, G.*; Chudnovskiy, A.*; Cordey, J. G.*; Greenwald, M. J.*; Hoang, G. T.*; Hogeweij, G. M. D.*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 40(12), p.1955 - 1981, 2000/12
no abstracts in English
shearing in improved confinement regimes in JT-60UShirai, Hiroshi; Kikuchi, Mitsuru; Takizuka, Tomonori; Fujita, Takaaki; Koide, Yoshihiko; Rewoldt, G.*; Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Budny, R.*; Tang, W. M.*; Kishimoto, Yasuaki; et al.
Fusion Energy 1998, 2, p.405 - 412, 1999/00
no abstracts in English
Shirai, Hiroshi; Kikuchi, Mitsuru; Takizuka, Tomonori; Fujita, Takaaki; Koide, Yoshihiko; Rewoldt, G.*; Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Budny, R.*; Tang, W. M.*; Kishimoto, Yasuaki; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 39(11Y), p.1713 - 1722, 1999/00
Times Cited Count：67 Percentile：87.27(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)no abstracts in English
Tanaka, Kenji*; Takenaga, Hidenobu; Muraoka, Katsunori*; Yoshida, Maiko; Michael, C.*; Vyacheslavov, L. N.*; Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Yokoyama, Masayuki*; Oyama, Naoyuki; Urano, Hajime; et al.
no journal, ,
Density profile and turbulence was compared in JT-60U tokamak and LHD heliotron. Density peaking increases with decrease of collisionality in JT-60U. Density gradient predicted from zero flux condition agrees within factor 2 for Te/Ti=1, but large discrepancies are found for Te/Ti 
=0.5. In LHD, peaked profile and increase of density peaking with decrease of collisionality are found in strong magnetic hill configuration (Rax = 3.5 m). Hollowed-peaked density profile and increase of density peaking with increase of collisionality are found in weak magnetic hill configuration (Rax = 3.6 m). Fluctuation is localized in core gradient region and edge gradient region. Density gradient predicted from zero flux condition are compared. Then both cases agrees the sign and absolute values within factor 2.
Tanaka, Kenji*; Takenaga, Hidenobu; Muraoka, Katsunori*; Oyama, Naoyuki; Yoshida, Maiko; Mikkelsen, D. R.*; Michael, C. A.*; Vyacheslavov, L. N.*
no journal, ,
Density profile and turbulence was compared in JT-60U tokamak and LHD heliotron. Density peaking increases with decrease of collisionality in JT-60U. Density gradient predicted from zero flux condition agrees within factor 2 for Te/Ti=1, but large discrepancies are found for Te/Ti = 0.5. In LHD, peaked profile and increase of density peaking with decrease of collisionality are found in strong magnetic hill configuration (Rax = 3.5 m). Hollowed-peaked density profile and increase of density peaking with increase of collisionality are found in weak magnetic hill configuration (Rax = 3.6 m). Fluctuation is localized in core gradient region and edge gradient region. Density gradient predicted from zero flux condition are compared. Then both cases agrees the sign and absolute values within factor 2.
