Explanation of the report prepared by the JHPS Task Group "Study committee on measurements of passive personal dosimeters during airport security screenings"

Maki, Daisuke*; Inukai, Yuji*; Sekiguchi, Hiroshi*; Shinozaki, Wakako*; Shimizu, Hideo*; Suzuki, Tomokazu*; Takemura, Takashi*; Hagiwara, Masayuki*; Higaki, Shogo*; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; et al.

Hoken Butsuri (Internet), 61(1), p.16 - 22, 2026/03

https://doi.org/10.5453/jhps.61.16

Research on factor analysis and technical process for achieving denuclearization; Research on technical process for achieving denuclearization

Shimizu, Ryo; Tazaki, Makiko; Kimura, Takashi; Hori, Masato

JAEA-Review 2025-030, 42 Pages, 2025/10

JAEA-Review-2025-030.pdf:1.35MB

To find measures to lead the expected denuclearization in the future successfully, effectively, and efficiently, we conducted the "Research on Factor Analysis and Technical Process for Achieving Denuclearization" from FY 2018 to FY2023. In the latter part of this research, as a study of the technical process to achieve denuclearization, the process of verification and dismantlement/disposal of nuclear materials and nuclear development-related facilities, etc., which are necessary to implement denuclearization in the target states, is studied based on technical knowledge and summarized with explanations especially from a technical perspective. However, nuclear weapons and their fabrication facilities were not included in the study because we do not have sufficient knowledge about them. These results will serve as a basis for future consideration of the denuclearization process and will also assist in considering how to guide the denuclearization of countries that have not yet achieved denuclearization, thereby contributing to the implementation of future denuclearization work.

Transverse asymmetry of individual rays in the La()La reaction

Okuizumi, Mao*; Auton, C. J.*; Endo, Shunsuke; Fujioka, Hiroyuki*; Hirota, Katsuya*; Ino, Takashi*; Ishizaki, Kohei*; Kimura, Atsushi; Kitaguchi, Masaaki*; Koga, Jun*; et al.

Physical Review C, 111(3), p.034611_1 - 034611_6, 2025/03

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.034611

Research on factor analysis and technical process for achieving denuclearization; Investigation of Iran's Case

Tazaki, Makiko; Shimizu, Ryo; Kimura, Takashi; Suda, Kazunori

JAEA-Review 2024-041, 88 Pages, 2024/11

JAEA-Review-2024-041.pdf:2.83MB

As part of the "Research on factor analysis and technical processes for achieving denuclearization", Investigation and analysis on Iran's nuclear development and denuclearization was conducted. Before Islamic Revolution, Iran pursued nuclear weapon related programs, however, the program was temporarily halted due to the Revolution. On the other hand, during the Iran-Iraq War, Iran was attacked by chemical weapons from Iraq, and it could not receive the response it wanted from the international community, so the Iran decided to pursue secret nuclear weapon program. In 2002, Iranian dissidents exposed Iran's clandestine nuclear activities, so the Iran seemed to have focused more on maintaining its uranium enrichment activities, rather than developing nuclear weapons. Since then, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom have been working to resolve the Iran's nuclear issues through diplomatic negotiations. In 2006, the US, Russia and PRC joined negotiations and in 2015, an agreement was reached with Iran as "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)". The lessons learned from Iran's denuclearization are that there are needs for momentum toward denuclearization in the international community as well as concord and cooperation among the five nuclear-weapon states. In addition, not only the effective use of sanctions including the clear condition of its lifting, but also keeping guarantees for the peaceful use of nuclear energy should not be undermined.

High sensitivity of a future search for effects of -odd/-odd interactions on the 0.75 eV -wave resonance in + forward transmission determined using a pulsed neutron beam

Nakabe, Rintaro*; Auton, C. J.*; Endo, Shunsuke; Fujioka, Hiroyuki*; Gudkov, V.*; Hirota, Katsuya*; Ide, Ikuo*; Ino, Takashi*; Ishikado, Motoyuki*; Kambara, Wataru*; et al.

Physical Review C, 109(4), p.L041602_1 - L041602_4, 2024/04

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.L041602

Research on factor analysis and technical process for achieving denuclearization; Denuclearization of Former Soviet Union (Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine)

Tazaki, Makiko; Kimura, Takashi; Shimizu, Ryo; Nakatani, Takayoshi; Suda, Kazunori

JAEA-Review 2023-042, 121 Pages, 2024/03

JAEA-Review-2023-042.pdf:3.01MB

As part of the "Research on Factor Analysis and Technical Processes for Achieving Denuclearization", we investigated denuclearization cases in three former Soviet Union countries, namely Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine, and analyzed the cases by eight denuclearization factors. We then considered the characteristics and lessons learned from such denuclearization. The denuclearization processes of the three countries differed from country to country, and Ukraine's denuclearization process in particular went through many twists and turns. However, the common factor was that all nuclear-weapon states provided security assurances to the three countries and as a result, they transferred strategic nuclear weapons to Russia and joined the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) as non-nuclear weapon states. Such decision was partly made possible by the economic and physical assistance provided by the United States and Russia for denuclearization. Furthermore, one of the characteristics of the denuclearization of the three countries is the US's skillful denuclearization strategy toward the three countries. The United States supported the claims that the three countries, like Russia, were parties to the First Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-I), and ultimately allowed them to transfer strategic nuclear warheads to Russia within the framework of START-I and the subsequently achieved the disposal of the warheads in Russia. Furthermore, as a lesson from the denuclearization of the three countries, providing security assurance to denuclearized countries is a strong incentive for denuclearization. However, considering Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, countries which are required denuclearization will seek stronger security guarantees from nuclear-weapon states. Another lesson is that it is necessary to have a strong presidential initiative the countries concerned.

Photoneutron emission cross sections for C

Utsunomiya, Hiroaki*; Goriely, S.*; Kimura, Masaaki*; Shimizu, Noritaka*; Utsuno, Yutaka; Tveten, G. M.*; Renstrm, T.*; Ariizumi, Takashi*; Miyamoto, Shuji*

Physical Review C, 109(1), p.014617_1 - 014617_7, 2024/01

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014617

no abstracts in English

Research on technical process for achieving denuclearization, 1; Disposal and verification of weapon grade HEU

Nakatani, Takayoshi; Shimizu, Ryo; Tazaki, Makiko; Kimura, Takashi; Hori, Masato

Dai-44-Kai Nihon Kaku Busshitsu Kanri Gakkai Nenji Taikai Kaigi Rombunshu (Internet), 3 Pages, 2023/11

no abstracts in English

Research on technical process for achieving denuclearization, 2; Disposal and verification of weapon grade plutonium

Shimizu, Ryo; Nakatani, Takayoshi; Tazaki, Makiko; Kimura, Takashi; Hori, Masato

Dai-44-Kai Nihon Kaku Busshitsu Kanri Gakkai Nenji Taikai Kaigi Rombunshu (Internet), 4 Pages, 2023/11

no abstracts in English

First observation of O

Kondo, Yosuke*; Achouri, N. L.*; Al Falou, H.*; Atar, L.*; Aumann, T.*; Baba, Hidetada*; Boretzky, K.*; Caesar, C.*; Calvet, D.*; Chae, H.*; et al.

Nature, 620(7976), p.965 - 970, 2023/08

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06352-6

no abstracts in English