Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Tsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Sato, Fuminobu*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko
Radioisotopes, 75(S-01), p.S-004_1 - S-004_6, 2026/04
Ba
-ray calibration field for photon energy in the 300-400 keV rangeTsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Kowatari, Munehiko*; Sato, Fuminobu*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 12 Pages, 2026/00
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)Tsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Nishino, Sho; Sato, Fuminobu*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko
Journal of Radiological Protection, 45(3), p.031519_1 - 031519_8, 2025/09
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)Tsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Sato, Fuminobu*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 201(9), p.648 - 662, 2025/06
Times Cited Count:2 Percentile:80.51(Environmental Sciences)Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Futagawa, Kazuo
JAEA-Research 2024-016, 26 Pages, 2025/02
In environmental radiation monitoring around nuclear facilities, dose measurements have been implemented by passive dosimetry systems using thermoluminescence dosimeters or radiophotoluminescence dosimeters. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter, hereinafter called OSLD, is one of the commonly used passive dosimeter for personal dose monitoring and provides highly reliable measurements. However, it has not been utilized for environmental dose monitoring purposes. The OSLD will be a promising dosimeter, which make it possible to conduct cost-effective and reliable environmental dose measurements by utilizing existing resources, such as readers and dosimeters. When considering the application of the OSLD using aluminum oxide (
-Al
O
:C) for environmental dose monitoring, the following problems should be solved: (1) the lack of a dose calculation algorithm to evaluate air-absorbed dose from OSL signals, and (2) the conformity with JIS Z 4346:2017, which specifies the required performance of passive dosimeters for environmental monitoring, has not been evaluated. Therefore, in this study, a dose calculation algorithm was developed using Monte Carlo simulations, and tests based on JIS Z 4346:2017 were conducted. As a result, it was confirmed that the OSLD meets the performance criteria mentioned in JIS Z 4346:2017. The effective measurement range is from 0.1 mGy to 1 Gy, the range of energy and angle of incidence are from 30 keV to 1.25 MeV and from 0
to
60
, the temperature and humidity range are from -20
C to 40
C and from 10% to 90%, which are adequate for environmental dose monitoring.
Kowatari, Munehiko*; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Tani, Kotaro*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Kurihara, Osamu*
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 200(16-18), p.1574 - 1579, 2024/11
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)Ishii, Junya*; Shimizu, Morihito*; Kato, Masahiro*; Kurosawa, Tadahiro*; Tsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Watabe, Hiroshi*
Journal of Radiological Protection, 44(3), p.031516_1 - 031516_8, 2024/09
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)
Am gamma calibration field based on international standards and its conversion coefficientsTsuji, Tomoya; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Kowatari, Munehiko*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 200(15), p.1416 - 1424, 2024/09
Times Cited Count:3 Percentile:60.19(Environmental Sciences)Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Nishino, Sho; Tsuji, Tomoya; Fukami, Tomoyo; Shinozuka, Tomoki; Oishi, Kohei; Ishii, Masato; Takamiya, Kei; Onuki, Takaya; et al.
Radiation Measurements, 176, p.107196_1 - 107196_6, 2024/08
Times Cited Count:1 Percentile:23.55(Nuclear Science & Technology)The ICRU has proposed to change the definitions of the operational quantities used for the area and individual monitoring for external exposure in the ICRU Report 95. As introducing the new operational quantities into the radiation monitoring may affect the dose assessment results using the present personal dosimeters, it is necessary to characterize the energy spectrum in the workplace and the energy dependency of the dosimeters to be used. In this work the photon spectra were measured using a NaI(Tl) scintillation detector or a LaBr
(Ce) scintillation detector at the workplaces in the Japanese Research Reactor No.3 (JRR-3) and the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) at Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). Then the present and new operational quantities were evaluated using the above mention spectra at the workplaces and compared each other.
Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi
Nihon Genshiryoku Gakkai-Shi ATOMO
, 66(1), p.42 - 45, 2024/01
no abstracts in English
(0.07) for extremity dose monitoring of medical personnelKowatari, Munehiko*; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Nagamoto, Keisuke*; Nakagami, Koichi*; Moritake, Takashi*; Kunugita, Naoki*
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 199(15-16), p.1807 - 1812, 2023/10
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Manabe, Kentaro; Ochi, Kotaro; Kono, Takahiko; Sasaki, Michiya*; Yoshida, Hiroko*
Hoken Butsuri (Internet), 58(2), p.105 - 111, 2023/08
This article gives the report on participation in the 6th Asian and Oceanic Congress on Radiation Protection (AOCRP6), which was held in Mumbai, India on between February 7th and 11th, 2023.
Kowatari, Munehiko*; Kubota, Takumi*; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Kunugita, Naoki*
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 199(11), p.1239 - 1247, 2023/07
Times Cited Count:0 Percentile:0.00(Environmental Sciences)Yoshitomi, Hiroshi
FBNews, (557), p.1 - 5, 2023/05
no abstracts in English
Yoshitomi, Hiroshi
Isotope News, (786), p.26 - 29, 2023/04
no abstracts in English
Kowatari, Munehiko*; Nagamoto, Keisuke*; Nakagami, Koichi*; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Moritake, Takashi*; Kunugita, Naoki*
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 198(17), p.1303 - 1312, 2022/10
Times Cited Count:2 Percentile:21.09(Environmental Sciences)Yokoyama, Sumi*; Tatsuzaki, Hideo*; Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Hirao, Shigekazu*; Aoki, Katsunori; Tachiki, Shuichi*; Ezaki, Iwao*; Hoshi, Katsuya; Tsujimura, Norio
Journal of Radiological Protection, 42(3), p.031504_1 - 031504_17, 2022/09
Times Cited Count:3 Percentile:31.97(Environmental Sciences)In Japan, the radiation-dose limit for the lens of the eye was revised in April 2021. Consequently, for workers, the numerical values of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye are equal to those of the effective dose. Radiation workers, radiation safety officers and licensees must comply with regulations related to radiation protection and optimize protection. The new guidelines on dose monitoring of the lens of the eye developed by the Japan Health Physics Society recommend for the dose to be estimated near the eye for accurate estimation, when the dose to the lens approaches or exceeds the management criteria. However, there is limited information regarding the non-uniform exposure of nuclear power plant workers. In this study, the dose equivalents of high-dose-rate workplaces and the personal doses of 88 workers were estimated at four Japanese commercial nuclear power plant sites (RWR: 3 units and BWR: 3 units) and the dose to the lens of the eye and the exposure situations of the workers were analyzed.
Yokoyama, Sumi*; Tsujimura, Norio; Hashimoto, Makoto; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Kato, Masahiro*; Kurosawa, Tadahiro*; Tatsuzaki, Hideo*; Sekiguchi, Hiroshi*; Koguchi, Yasuhiro*; Ono, Koji*; et al.
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 47(1), p.1 - 7, 2022/03
Background: In Japan, new regulations that revise the dose limit for the lens of the eye (the lens), operational quantities, and measurement positions for the lens dose were enforced in April 2021. Based on the international safety standards, national guidelines, the results of the Radiation Safety Research Promotion Fund of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority, and other studies, the Working Group of Radiation Protection Standardization Committee, the Japan Health Physics Society (JHPS) developed a guideline for radiation dose monitoring for the lens. Materials and Methods: The Working Group of the JHPS discussed the criteria of non-uniform exposure and the management criteria set to not exceed the dose limit for the lens. Results and Discussion: In July 2020, the JHPS guideline was published. The guideline consists of three parts: main text, explanations, and 26 questions. In the questions, the corresponding answers were prepared, and specific examples were provided to enable similar cases to be addressed. Conclusion: With the development of guideline on radiation dose monitoring of the lens, radiation managers and workers will be able to smoothly comply with revised regulations and optimise radiation protection.
Yokoyama, Sumi*; Iwai, Satoshi*; Tsujimura, Norio; Hashimoto, Makoto; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Kato, Masahiro*; Kurosawa, Tadahiro*; Tatsuzaki, Hideo*; Sekiguchi, Hiroshi*; Koguchi, Yasuhiro*; et al.
Proceedings of 15th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA-15) (Internet), 8 Pages, 2022/00
Sr+
Y beta field; Full-face mask respirator shielding and dosemeter positioningTsujimura, Norio; Hoshi, Katsuya; Yamazaki, Takumi; Momose, Takumaro; Aoki, Katsunori; Yoshitomi, Hiroshi; Tanimura, Yoshihiko; Yokoyama, Sumi*
KEK Proceedings 2020-5, p.21 - 28, 2020/11