Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Chiba, Go; Kugo, Teruhiko
Proceedings of International Conference on Physics of Reactors; Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR 2010) (CD-ROM), 11 Pages, 2010/05
We perform neutronic calculations for steel-reflected fast critical systems with the sub-group S method. In the present sub-group S
calculations, we do not assume the narrow resonance approximation and do consider sub-group to sub-group transfer probabilities for in-group scattering sources. In addition, sub-group dependence of out-group scattering sources, which has been ignored in previous studies, is also taken into account. The present sub-group S
method is applied to neutronic calculations for several steel-reflected fast systems included in the ICSBEP handbook. It is shown that the present sub-group SN method reproduces quite well the reference Monte-Carlo solutions for the effective multiplication factor and neutron flux spatial distribution above 0.1 MeV in reflector regions.
Ivanova, T.*; Fernex, F.*; Kolbe, E.*; Vasiliev, A.*; Lee, G. S.*; Woo, S. W.*; Mennerdahl, D.*; Nagaya, Yasunobu; Neuber, J. C.*; Hoefer, A.*; et al.
Proceedings of International Conference on Physics of Reactors; Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR 2010) (CD-ROM), 15 Pages, 2010/05
The expert group (EG) on Uncertainty Analysis for Criticality Safety Assessment (UACSA) was established within the OECD/NEA Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety in December 2007 to promote exchange of information on related topics; compare methods and software tools for uncertainty analysis; test their performance; and assist in selection/development of safe and efficient methodologies for validation of criticality computations. At the current stage, the work of the group is focused on approaches for validation of criticality calculations. With the diversity of the approaches to validate criticality calculations, a thorough description of each approach and assessment of its performance is useful to the criticality safety community. Developers, existing and potential practitioners as well as reviewers of assessments using those approaches should benefit from this effort. Exercise Phase I was conducted in order to illustrate predicting capabilities of criticality validation approaches, which include similarity assessment, definition of bias and bias uncertainty, and selection of benchmarks. The approaches and results of the exercises will be thoroughly documented in a pending state-of-the-art report from the EG. This paper provides an overview of current and future activities for the EG, a summary of the participant-contributed validation approaches, and a synthesis of the results for the exercises.