Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Harada, Masahide; Teshigawara, Makoto; Oi, Motoki; Oikawa, Kenichi; Takada, Hiroshi; Ikeda, Yujiro
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 1000, p.165252_1 - 165252_8, 2021/06
Times Cited Count:1 Percentile:39.09(Instruments & Instrumentation)This study explores high-energy neutron components of the extracted neutron beam at J-PARC pulsed neutron source using the foil activation method with threshold reactions. Foils of aluminum, gold, bismuth, niobium, and thulium were used to cover the neutron energy range from 0.3 MeV to 79.4 MeV. The experiment was performed using neutron beams of BL10 (NOBORU). The foils were irradiated by a neutron beam at 13.4 m from the moderator. To characterize high-energy neutron fields for irradiation applications, reaction rates in three different configurations with and without BC slit and Pb filter were examined. To compare the experiments with calculations given for the user, reaction rates for corresponding reactions were calculated by the PHITS code with the JENDL-3.2 and the JENDL dosimetry file. Although there was a systematic tendency in C/E (Calculation/Experiment) ratios for different threshold energies, which C/E ratio decreased as threshold energy increased up to 100 MeV, and all C/E ratios were in the range of 1.0
0.2. This indicated that high-energy neutron calculations were adequate for the analysis of experimental data for NOBORU users.
Kasugai, Yoshimi; Harada, Masahide; Kai, Tetsuya; Oi, Motoki; Meigo, Shinichiro; Maekawa, Fujio
JAEA-Data/Code 2015-033, 28 Pages, 2016/03
The high-energy neutron fluxes and spectra around the mercury spallation neutron source at MLF of J-PARC were measured by the multi-foil activation method. The threshold energies of neutron reactions utilized in this experiment covered from 0.1 to 50 MeV. The foil irradiation was carried out on the first beam-run of MLF from May 30th to 31th, 2008. After the irradiation, the induced radioactivity of each foil was measured using an HPGe detector, and the neutron-induced reaction-rate distribution around the mercury target was determined. Using these data, the high-energy neutron fluxes and spectra were deduced with unfolding method in which the neutron spectra calculated with PHITS code were used as the initial-guess spectra. By comparison between the initial and the unfolded spectra, it was shown that most of the calculation results, which had been the basis of the neutronics design of the MLF target assembly, were consistent with the experimental data within 30%.
Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi; Kumada, Hiroaki; Kishi, Toshiaki; Torii, Yoshiya; Sakurai, Yoshinori*; Kobayashi, Toru*
Proceedings of 11th World Congress on Neutron Capture Therapy (ISNCT-11) (CD-ROM), 15 Pages, 2004/10
To carry out the boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) using the epithermal neutron, the epithermal neutron beam intensity was measured by using Au reaction rate activated on the resonance absorption peak (4.9eV). Two scaling factors, which are the reactor power calibration factor and the calculation/experiment (C/E) scaling factor, are necessary in order to correct with the simulation and actual irradiation experiment. First, an optimum detector position was investigated using MCNP code. The result of MCNP calculation showed that the influence of subject placed at the collimator was below 1% when the detector was placed in the distance of over 20cm from the collimator. Therefore we installed the monitor holders near the bismuth block in order to set three gold wire monitors. The factors were determined in the calibration experiments that measure the thermal neutron flux in the phantom and reaction rate of the gold wire monitors. The monitoring technique to measure epithermal neutron beam intensity was applied to clinical irradiation with the epithermal neutron beam.
Nakao, Makoto*; Hori, Junichi*; Ochiai, Kentaro; Sato, Satoshi; Yamauchi, Michinori*; Ishioka, Noriko; Nishitani, Takeo
Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (ND 2004), p.1489 - 1492, 2004/09
no abstracts in English
Yamamoto, Tetsuya*; Matsumura, Akira*; Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi; Kumada, Hiroaki; Shibata, Yasushi*; Nose, Tadao*
Physics in Medicine & Biology, 47(14), p.2387 - 2396, 2002/07
Times Cited Count:25 Percentile:58.24(Engineering, Biomedical)The aim of this study was to determine the in-phantom thermal distribution derived from neutron beams for intraoperative boron neutron capture therapy (IOBNCT). Gold activation wires arranged in a cylindrical water phantom with (void-in phantom) or without (standard phantom) a cylinder styrene form placed inside were irradiated by using the epithermal beam (ENB) and the mixed thermal-epithermal beam (TNB-1) at the JRR-4. The thermal neutron distribution derived from both the ENB and TNB-1 was significantly improved in the void-in-phantom, and a double high dose area was formed lateral to the void. The flattened distribution in the circumference of the void was observed with the combination of ENB and the void-in-phantom. The measurement data suggest that the ENB may provide a clinical advantage in the form of an enhanced and flattened dose delivery to the marginal tissue in which residual and/or microscopically infiltrating tumor.
Maekawa, Fujio; Wada, Masayuki*; Von-Moellendorff, U.*; Wilson, P. P. H.*; Ikeda, Yujiro
Fusion Engineering and Design, 51-52(Part.B), p.815 - 820, 2000/11
Times Cited Count:3 Percentile:26.5(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
Kim, E.; Nakamura, Takashi*; Uwamino, Y.*; Ito, S.*; Fukumura, A.*
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 37(Suppl.1), p.811 - 815, 2000/03
no abstracts in English
Maekawa, Fujio; U.Moellendorff*; P.Wilson*; Ikeda, Yujiro
Fusion Technology, 36(2), p.165 - 172, 1999/09
no abstracts in English
Barnes, C. W.*; Loughlin, M. J.*; Nishitani, Takeo
Review of Scientific Instruments, 68(1), p.577 - 580, 1997/01
Times Cited Count:26 Percentile:83(Instruments & Instrumentation)no abstracts in English
W.S.Charlton*; T.A.Parish*; S.Raman*; Shinohara, Nobuo; Ando, Masaki
PHYSOR 96: Int. Conf. on the Physics of Reactors, 3, p.F11 - F20, 1996/00
no abstracts in English
Oyama, Yukio; Konno, Chikara; Ikeda, Yujiro; Kosako, Kazuaki*; Maekawa, Hiroshi; Nakamura, Tomoo; M.A.Abdou*; Bennett, E. F.*; A.Kumar*; *; et al.
Fusion Technology, 28(2), p.305 - 319, 1995/09
no abstracts in English
Nakakawa, Masayuki; Mori, Takamasa; Kosako, Kazuaki*; Oyama, Yukio; Ikeda, Yujiro; Konno, Chikara; Maekawa, Hiroshi; *; M.A.Abdou*; Bennett, E. F.*; et al.
Fusion Technology, 28, p.39 - 55, 1995/08
no abstracts in English
M.Hoek*; Nishitani, Takeo; Ikeda, Yujiro; Morioka, Atsuhiko
Review of Scientific Instruments, 66(1), p.885 - 887, 1995/01
Times Cited Count:23 Percentile:83.53(Instruments & Instrumentation)no abstracts in English
Okajima, Shigeaki; Oigawa, Hiroyuki; Mukaiyama, Takehiko; *; Kasahara, Y.*; *
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 66, p.523 - 524, 1992/11
no abstracts in English
Maekawa, Hiroshi; Oyama, Yukio; Tanaka, Shunichi
Proc. of the Topical Meeting on New Horizons in Radiation Protection and Shielding, p.611 - 618, 1992/00
no abstracts in English
Maekawa, Hiroshi; ; Konno, Chikara; Oyama, Yukio; Ikeda, Yujiro; *; Kosako, Kazuaki*
Fusion Technology, 19, p.1949 - 1954, 1991/05
no abstracts in English
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
JAERI-M 86-182, 78 Pages, 1986/12
no abstracts in English
; ; ; Nakagawa, Masayuki;
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 52, p.112 - 113, 1986/00
no abstracts in English
; ; ; ; ; *; *
JAERI-M 84-193, 34 Pages, 1984/10
no abstracts in English
;
Hoken Butsuri, 19, p.341 - 347, 1984/00
no abstracts in English