Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Kaufmann, S.*; Simpson, D. A.*; Hall, L. T.*; Perunicic, V.*; Senn, P.*; Steinert, S.*; McGuinness, L. P.*; Johnson, B. C.*; Oshima, Takeshi; Caruso, F.*; et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(27), p.10894 - 10898, 2013/07
Times Cited Count：107 Percentile：93.27(Multidisciplinary Sciences)Arnold, D.*; Seibert, P.*; Nagai, Haruyasu; Wotawa, G.*; Skomorowski, P.*; Baumann-Stanzer, K.*; Polreich, E.*; Langer, M.*; Jones, A.*; Hort, M.*; et al.
Lagrangian Modeling of the Atmosphere, p.329 - 347, 2013/05
WSPEEDI uses a combination of non-hydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model MM5 and Lagrangian particle dispersion model GEARN. MM5 is a community model having many users all over the world and is used for the official weather forecast by some countries. GEARN calculates the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides by tracing the trajectories of a large number of marker particles discharged from a release point. Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) has been undertaking the task to assess the radiological dose to the public resulting from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident by using both environmental monitoring data and computer simulation on the dispersion of radioactive materials in the environment. As the first step, the source term of radioactive materials discharged into the atmosphere was estimated. Then, by using the estimated source term, detailed analysis on the local atmospheric dispersion around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant has been carried out.
Chankin, A. V.*; Coster, D. P.*; Asakura, Nobuyuki; Bonnin, X.*; Conway, G. D.*; Corrigan, G.*; Erents, S. K.*; Fundamenski, W.*; Horacek, J.*; Kallenbach, A.*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 47(5), p.479 - 489, 2007/05
Times Cited Count：34 Percentile：73.71(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)Radial electric field in known to be one of the drivers for the parallel ion flow in the SOL. It contributes to the ion Pfirsch-Schluter flow and determines the return parallel flow compensating poloidal ExB drift. It was established recently that 2D fluid codes EDGE2D and SOLPS underestimate the predicted Er in the SOL compared to experimentally measured values. The present work demonstrates that this underestimate can be responsible for the large discrepancy between measured and simulated parallel ion flows in the SOL. Provided radial electric field was modelled correctly by the codes, an increase in the predicted Mach number of the parallel ion flow by up to a factor 3 for the JET could be expected. This would entirely eliminate the difference between the experimentally determined part of the ion flow that depends on the toroidal field direction, and the modelled ion flow attributed to drifts. Discrepancy between measured and simulated flows in ASDEX-Upgrade was also reduced.
