Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Sasaki, Michiya*; Furukawa, Kyoji*; Satoh, Daiki; Shimada, Kazumasa; Kudo, Shinichi*; Takagi, Shunji*; Takahara, Shogo; Kai, Michiaki*
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 48(2), p.90 - 99, 2023/06
This paper reports on the calculation code that is the result of the activities of the "Task Group for Development of Cancer Risk Estimation Codes Associated with Radiation Exposure (FY2020-2021)" established by the Japan Health Physics Society. In order to promote research on the estimation of cancer risk associated with radiation exposure, the Task Group decided to disclose the source code, including the algorithm and parameters used in the calculations, and to release the code under a license that permits modification and redistribution of the code. The computational code was named SUMRAY and coded in two computer languages, that is R and Python. The code is capable of calculating the accumulated excess risk using Monte Carlo methods with a 95% confidence interval. The results of SUMRAY were compared with the results of the existing codes whose source code is not publicly available, under the same calculation conditions. From the results, it was found that they were in reasonable agreement within the confidence interval. It is expected that SUMRAY, an open-source software, will be used as a common basis for cancer risk estimation studies associated with radiation exposure.
Furuta, Hiroshige*; Sato, Kaoru; Nishide, Akemi*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Saigusa, Shin*
Health Physics, 121(5), p.471 - 483, 2021/11
Times Cited Count:1 Percentile:15.7(Environmental Sciences)Low dose radiation induced "health effects" containing cancer risk for a Japanese radiation worker cohort is epidemiologically evaluated using the personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)). On the other hand, Hp(10) is not recommended for epidemiological evaluation of cancer risks, since the Hp(10) is widely used for radiological protection purposes. In addition, the cancer risk depends on organ doses rather than Hp(10). Thus, we developed a new method for estimating organ doses from Hp(10) of radiation workers. The developed method enables epidemiological analysis against Japanese radiation workers by considering the response characteristics of personal dosimeters, exposure geometry and energy, and body size of radiation workers in Japan. In the future, we will reconstruct organ dose conversion factor and will evaluate the risk of cancer mortality and morbidity using the organ dose in Japan.
Furuta, Hiroshige*; Tsujimura, Norio; Nishide, Akemi*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Saigusa, Shin*
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 189(3), p.371 - 383, 2020/05
Times Cited Count:4 Percentile:44.4(Environmental Sciences)Sakai, Kazuo*; Yamada, Yu*; Yoshida, Kazuo*; Yoshinaga, Shinji*; Sato, Kaoru; Ogata, Hiromitsu*; Iwasaki, Toshiharu*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Asada, Kyosei*; Kawaguchi, Isao*; et al.
no journal, ,
Task Group of Low dose and Low Dose Rate Radiation Risk Estimation Method in the Japan Health Physics Society presented the task group activity from April, 2016 to March, 2018. The presenter introduce the current status and issues of dose assessment (e.g. effects of anatomical characteristics of subjects, monitoring data, distribution of dose and dose rate in body on uncertainty of dose assessment).
Yoshida, Hiroko*; Nomura, Naoki*; Kono, Takahiko; Sakoda, Akihiro; Kuroda, Yujiro*; Naito, Wataru*; Hirota, Seiko*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Etani, Reo*; Chikamoto, Kazuhiko*; et al.
no journal, ,
This working group has been translating into Japanese the publication "Practical Guidance for Engagement with the Public on Radiation and Risk" by IRPA in 2020. This publication was made with the theme of public understanding, which was one of key issues that the consultation by IRPA to its member societies identified as most necessary in the radiation protection system. The translated guidance is supposed to be distributed to radiation protection experts and relevant communities in Japan who may be interested in public understanding. The purpose of this symposium is to share the working progress and important points of the guidance.
Yoshida, Hiroko*; Nomura, Naoki*; Kono, Takahiko; Sakoda, Akihiro; Kuroda, Yujiro*; Naito, Wataru*; Hirota, Seiko*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Takahara, Shogo; Etani, Reo*; et al.
no journal, ,
The WG has translated the "Practical Guidance for Engagement with the Public on Radiation and Risk" ("IRPA Guidance") issued by the International Radiation Protection Association ("IRPA") to its member societies in 2020. "Practical Guidance for Engagement with the Public on Radiation and Risk" (hereinafter referred to as "IRPA Guidance") published by the International Radiological Protection Association (hereinafter referred to as "IRPA") in 2020 for its member societies, and to provide the information to radiation protection experts and other interested.
Yoshida, Hiroko*; Nomura, Naoki*; Kono, Takahiko; Sakoda, Akihiro; Kuroda, Yujiro*; Naito, Wataru*; Hirota, Seiko*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Kawaguchi, Isao*; Etani, Reo*; et al.
no journal, ,
The WG has translated the "Practical Guidance for Engagement with the Public on Radiation and Risk" ("IRPA Guidance") issued by the International Radiation Protection Association ("IRPA") to its member societies in 2020. "The content of the IRPA guidance was presented at a symposium organized by the Health Physics Society of Japan in June 2020. The content of the IRPA guidance was presented at the Health Physics Society planning symposium held in June 2020, where many experts attended and provided feedback. In this planning session, we will focus on public engagement and related specific examples and situations related to public engagement.
Sasaki, Michiya*; Takagi, Shunji*; Kai, Michiaki*; Furukawa, Kyoji*; Kawaguchi, Isao*; Kudo, Shinichi*; Takahara, Shogo; Otoshi, Kazuki*; Shimada, Kazumasa; Satoh, Daiki
no journal, ,
To contribute to the quantitative discussion of risks associated with low-dose radiation exposure, the Japan Society of Health Physics established the "Task Group for the Development of Estimation Codes for Cancer Risk caused by Radiation Exposure". This presentation will report on the activities conducted during the two-year period from FY2020 to FY2021.
Satoh, Daiki; Sasaki, Michiya*; Furukawa, Kyoji*; Shimada, Kazumasa; Kudo, Shinichi*; Takahara, Shogo; Takagi, Shunji*; Kai, Michiaki*
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Sasaki, Michiya*; Furukawa, Kyoji*; Satoh, Daiki; Shimada, Kazumasa; Kudo, Shinichi*; Takahara, Shogo; Takagi, Shunji*; Kai, Michiaki*
no journal, ,
no abstracts in English
Kai, Michiaki*; Shimada, Kazumasa; Kudo, Shinichi*; Furukawa, Kyoji*; Satoh, Daiki; Takahara, Shogo; Takagi, Shunji*; Sasaki, Michiya*
no journal, ,
This presentation is the third in a series of three presentations on the results of the "Expert Group on the Development of Cancer Risk Estimation Codes Associated with Radiation Exposure" established by the Japan Health Physics Society, which examines the parameters employed in the codes and the calculation results, and summarizes the future prospects of the codes. In order to calculate cumulative excess risk (CER) as a measure of lifetime risk with confidence intervals, a variance-covariance matrix for the parameters of the risk model is required. However, in a study conducted by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation using the regression analysis program Epicure on large-scale epidemiological data from A-bomb survivors, the variance-covariance matrix was not disclosed. Therefore, in this study, we independently derived parameters and covariance matrices using a generalized linear model (GLM) and confirmed that the parameter values agreed well with the Epicure results. The CERs calculated using the derived parameters and covariance matrices were compared with those calculated by the U.S. code RadRAT. Although a simple comparison is not possible due to the different population baselines of the two codes, they were found to be in general agreement. The developed code is expected to contribute to the discussion of influence factors and uncertainty in risk assessment.