Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Zhang, W. Q.*; Andreyev, A. N.; Liu, Z.*; Seweryniak, D.*; Huang, H.*; 37 of others*
Physical Review C, 106(2), p.024317_1 - 024317_11, 2022/08
Times Cited Count:1 Percentile:33.4(Physics, Nuclear)Zhang, Z. Y.*; Yang, H. B.*; Andreyev, A. N.; Liu, M. L.*; Ma, L.*; 37 of others*
Physical Review Letters, 126(15), p.152502_1 - 152502_6, 2021/04
Times Cited Count:40 Percentile:96.23(Physics, Multidisciplinary)Kou, E.*; Tanida, Kiyoshi; Belle II Collaboration*; 537 of others*
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Internet), 2020(2), p.029201_1 - 029201_6, 2020/02
Times Cited Count:123 Percentile:100(Physics, Multidisciplinary)Kou, E.*; Tanida, Kiyoshi; Belle II Collaboration*; 537 of others*
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Internet), 2019(12), p.123C01_1 - 123C01_654, 2019/12
Times Cited Count:404 Percentile:99.98(Physics, Multidisciplinary)Yang, S. B.*; Hasegawa, Shoichi; Hayakawa, Shuhei*; Hosomi, Kenji; Ichikawa, Yudai; Imai, Kenichi; Sako, Hiroyuki; Sato, Susumu; Tamura, Hirokazu*; Tanida, Kiyoshi; et al.
JPS Conference Proceedings (Internet), 26, p.023015_1 - 023015_5, 2019/11
Yang, S. B.*; Ekawa, Hiroyuki; Hasegawa, Shoichi; Hayakawa, Shuhei; Hosomi, Kenji; Ichikawa, Yudai; Imai, Kenichi; Sako, Hiroyuki; Sato, Susumu; Tanida, Kiyoshi; et al.
Physical Review Letters, 120(13), p.132505_1 - 132505_5, 2018/03
Times Cited Count:8 Percentile:54.37(Physics, Multidisciplinary)Gogami, Toshiyuki*; Ekawa, Hiroyuki; Hasegawa, Shoichi; Hayakawa, Shuhei; Hosomi, Kenji; Imai, Kenichi; Ichikawa, Yudai; Nanamura, Takuya; Naruki, Megumi; Sako, Hiroyuki; et al.
JPS Conference Proceedings (Internet), 18, p.011031_1 - 011031_6, 2017/11
Ichikawa, Yudai; Hasegawa, Shoichi; Hosomi, Kenji; Imai, Kenichi; Sako, Hiroyuki; Sato, Susumu; Sugimura, Hitoshi; 37 of others*
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Internet), 2015(2), p.021D01_1 - 021D01_8, 2015/02
Times Cited Count:68 Percentile:92.75(Physics, Multidisciplinary)We have observed a ""-like structure in the reaction at 1.69 GeV/. In this reaction a hyperon resonance is expected to be produced as a doorway to form through the process. However, most of the produced would escape from the deuteron without secondary reactions. Therefore, coincidence of high-momentum ( 250 MeV/) proton(s)at large emission angles () was requested to enhance the signal-to-background ratio. A broad enhancement in the proton coincidence spectra is observed around the missing mass of 2.27 GeV/, which corresponds to the binding energy of 95 (stat.) (syst.) MeV and the width of 162 (stat.) (syst.) MeV.
Ichikawa, Yudai; Hasegawa, Shoichi; Hosomi, Kenji; Imai, Kenichi; Sako, Hiroyuki; Sato, Susumu; Sugimura, Hitoshi; 37 of others*
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Internet), 2014(10), p.101D03_1 - 101D03_8, 2014/10
Times Cited Count:14 Percentile:65.73(Physics, Multidisciplinary)We have measured an inclusive missing-mass spectrum of the reaction at the pion incident momentum of 1.69 GeV/ at the laboratory scattering angles between 2 and 16 with the missing-mass resolution of 2.7 0.1 MeV/ (FWHM) at the missing mass of 2.27 GeV/. While gross spectrum structures are well understood in the simple quasi-free picture, we have observed two distinct deviations; one peculiar enhancement at2.13 GeV/ is due to the cusp, and the other notable feature is a shift of a broad bump structure, mainly originating from hyperon resonance productions of and , by about 22.4 0.4 (stat.) (syst.) MeV/ toward the low-mass side, which is calculated in the kinematics of a proton at rest as the target.
Imai, Kenichi; Tanida, Kiyoshi; PHENIX Collaboration*; 378 of others*
Physical Review D, 90(1), p.012007_1 - 012007_19, 2014/07
Times Cited Count:56 Percentile:88.57(Astronomy & Astrophysics)Results are presented from data recorded in 2009 by the PHENIX experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider for the double-longitudinal spin asymmetry, for and production in = 200 GeV polarized + collisions. The effect of adding the new 2009 data to a recent global analysis of polarized scattering data is shown, resulting in a best fit value = 0.06 in the range 0.05 0.2.