Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Kikuchi, Mitsuru; Lackner, K.*; Tran, M. Q.*
Fusion Physics, 1129 Pages, 2012/00
This bokk is 50 years anniversary textbook with 1200 pages on fusion physics published by IAEA. Representative phycisists all over the world contributed to this book. Chapter 1 : Prof. Kaw, Chapter 2: Prof. Goldston, Chapter 3: Prof. Lackner, Chapter 4: Dr. Zaveryaev, Chapter 5: Kikuchi, Okumura, Chapter 6: Prof. Porkolab, Chapter 7: Prof. Li, Chapter 8: Prof. Wagner, Chapter 9: Prof. Prager, Chapter 10: Prof. Mima
Kamada, Yutaka; Barabaschi, P.*; Ishida, Shinichi; Ide, Shunsuke; Lackner, K.*; Fujita, Takaaki; Bolzonella, T.*; Suzuki, Takahiro; Matsunaga, Go; Yoshida, Maiko; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 51(7), p.073011_1 - 073011_11, 2011/07
Times Cited Count：64 Percentile：92.1(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)Shimada, Michiya; Campbell, D. J.*; Mukhovatov, V.*; Fujiwara, Masami*; Kirneva, N.*; Lackner, K.*; Nagami, Masayuki; Pustovitov, V. D.*; Uckan, N.*; Wesley, J.*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 47(6), p.S1 - S17, 2007/06
Times Cited Count：744 Percentile：99.93(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)The Progress in the ITER Physics Basis document is an update of the ITER Physics Basis (IPB), which was published in 1999. The IPB provided methodologies for projecting the performance of burning plasmas, developed largely through coordinated experimental, modeling and theoretical activities carried out on today's tokamaks (ITER Physics R&D). In the IPB, projections for ITER (1998 Design) were also presented. The IPB also pointed out some outstanding issues. These issues have been addressed by the International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA), which were initiated by the European Union, Japan, Russia and the U.S.A.. The new methodologies of projection and control developed through the ITPA are applied to ITER, which was redesigned under revised technical objectives, but will nonetheless meet the programmatic objective of providing an integrated demonstration of the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy.
Chankin, A. V.*; Coster, D. P.*; Asakura, Nobuyuki; Bonnin, X.*; Conway, G. D.*; Corrigan, G.*; Erents, S. K.*; Fundamenski, W.*; Horacek, J.*; Kallenbach, A.*; et al.
Nuclear Fusion, 47(5), p.479 - 489, 2007/05
Times Cited Count：34 Percentile：73.71(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)Radial electric field in known to be one of the drivers for the parallel ion flow in the SOL. It contributes to the ion Pfirsch-Schluter flow and determines the return parallel flow compensating poloidal ExB drift. It was established recently that 2D fluid codes EDGE2D and SOLPS underestimate the predicted Er in the SOL compared to experimentally measured values. The present work demonstrates that this underestimate can be responsible for the large discrepancy between measured and simulated parallel ion flows in the SOL. Provided radial electric field was modelled correctly by the codes, an increase in the predicted Mach number of the parallel ion flow by up to a factor 3 for the JET could be expected. This would entirely eliminate the difference between the experimentally determined part of the ion flow that depends on the toroidal field direction, and the modelled ion flow attributed to drifts. Discrepancy between measured and simulated flows in ASDEX-Upgrade was also reduced.
Ide, Shunsuke; Kamada, Yutaka; Lackner, K.*; Bolzonella, T.*; Fujita, Takaaki; JT-60SA Team
no journal, ,
