Refine your search:     
Report No.
 - 
Search Results: Records 1-2 displayed on this page of 2
  • 1

Presentation/Publication Type

Initialising ...

Refine

Journal/Book Title

Initialising ...

Meeting title

Initialising ...

First Author

Initialising ...

Keyword

Initialising ...

Language

Initialising ...

Publication Year

Initialising ...

Held year of conference

Initialising ...

Save select records

Oral presentation

Beam study of the extructed beam from the RFQ of the J-PARC linac

Yanai, Kyosuke; Kondo, Yasuhiro; Otani, Masashi*

no journal, , 

We have upgraded the J-PARC linac to a beam current of 50 mA. As the beam current increase, more precise beam tuning is required in the medium-energy beam transport (MEBT1) line from RFQ to DTL. To obtain more precise beam orbit information, we reconfirm the electric centers of the BPM's installed in the quadrupole magnets match to the magnetic centers of the quadrupoles using beam based alignment (BBA) method for all BPM's in the MEBT. As a result, we obtained data indicating some BPM's centers are at most 3 mm displaced from the quadrupole centers. This suggests that the responses of these BPM's are not correctly correspond to the actual beam position. Further investigation of the BMP response is needed.

Oral presentation

Beam characterization of medium energy transport line (MEBT1) to improve beam emittance in J-PARC linac

Yanai, Kyosuke; Iinuma, Hiromi*; Otani, Masashi*; Kondo, Yasuhiro; Hirano, Koichiro; Miyao, Tomoaki*; Moriya, Katsuhiro

no journal, , 

Currently, in the J-PARC linac, the emittance growth of 20 to 30% between the radio frequency linac (RFQ) and drift tube linac (DTL) in an large issue. The mismatch into the DTL is a candidate of the reason and precise beam measurement at the medium energy beam transport (MEBT) is necessary. The emittance and twiss parameters are now measured using Q-scan method, but the systematic error of this measurement is not yet fully evaluated. To this end, the measured emittance with Q-scan method and that with double-slit type emittance scanner should be compared to evaluate the measurement accuracy. We conducted this measurement at an RFQ test stand. Currently, there are difference of 2-3 mm between the measured profile and the simulation. The RFQ simulation needs to be reconsidered. The beam based alignment of the beam profile monitor has been performed also. The difference of 1mm between the magnetic and BPM center is observed, and the reason is under investigation. In this paper, these beam measurements are described.

2 (Records 1-2 displayed on this page)
  • 1