検索対象:     
報告書番号:
※ 半角英数字
 年 ~ 
 年

CSNI leak-before-break benchmark; Summary of phase 1

CSNI破断前漏えいに関するベンチマーク; フェーズ1のまとめ

Tregoning, R.*; Wallace, J.*; Bouydo, A.*; Costa-Garrido, O.*; Dillstr$"o$m, P.*; Duan, X.*; Heckmann, K.*; Kim, Y.-B.*; Kim, Y.*; Kurth-Twombly, E.*; Kuutti, J.*; 真野 晃宏 ; Niffenegger, M.*; Oh, Y.-J.*; Samohyl, P.*; Singh, P. K.*; Yang, S.*

Tregoning, R.*; Wallace, J.*; Bouydo, A.*; Costa-Garrido, O.*; Dillstr$"o$m, P.*; Duan, X.*; Heckmann, K.*; Kim, Y.-B.*; Kim, Y.*; Kurth-Twombly, E.*; Kuutti, J.*; Mano, Akihiro; Niffenegger, M.*; Oh, Y.-J.*; Samohyl, P.*; Singh, P. K.*; Yang, S.*

破断前漏えいに関する国際ベンチマーク活動は、11か国から14機関が参加して実施された。本ベンチマーク活動では、参加者は最初に所定の寸法の亀裂が自国のLBB許容基準を満足するかを判断し、次に溶接残留応力(WRS)と亀裂の形態が、亀裂開口変位(COD),限界曲げモーメント(CBM)及び漏えい量(LR)の結果に及ぼす影響を特定した。最初のタスクでは、14の参加機関のうち6機関がLBBの要件を満たすことを示した。次のタスクでは、参加機関のCBMの予測の違いは主に用いた材料特性の違いによるものであり、評価手法の違いはそれほど影響しないこと、また、LRの予測の違いはほぼCODの評価手法の違いに起因するが一部は亀裂面圧力(CFP)の処理に起因すること等の結果が得られた。本ベンチマークを通じて、より現実的なLBB評価を行うための要点を特定した。

Fourteen organizations, representing eleven countries, participated in a leak-before-break (LBB) benchmark exercise that compared results from analyses among participating countries and identified the effects of weld residual stress (WRS) and crack morphology on crack opening displacement (COD), critical bending moment (CBM), and leak rate (LR) results. The participants determined whether the initial problem would meet their country's LBB acceptance criteria and then evaluated the effects of crack morphology and WRS for a prescribed crack size, geometry and loading. Six out of fourteen participants indicated that the initial problem met their LBB requirements. In the follow-on tasks, differences among the participant's CBM predictions were principally due to the material properties used in the analysis while the type of failure model chosen contributed much less. Most of the differences in the LR predictions were directly attributable to differences among the COD models, but a portion was attributable to the treatment of crack face pressure (CFP). The benchmark identified several aspects of an LBB analysis that could support a more realistic evaluation.

Access

:

- Accesses

InCites™

:

Altmetrics

:

[CLARIVATE ANALYTICS], [WEB OF SCIENCE], [HIGHLY CITED PAPER & CUP LOGO] and [HOT PAPER & FIRE LOGO] are trademarks of Clarivate Analytics, and/or its affiliated company or companies, and used herein by permission and/or license.