検索対象:     
報告書番号:
※ 半角英数字
 年 ~ 
 年

Study of treatment scenarios for fuel debris removed from Fukushima Daiichi NPS

福島第一原子力発電所から取出した燃料デブリの取扱いに関する検討

鷲谷 忠博; 矢野 公彦; 鍛治 直也; 山田 誠也*; 紙谷 正仁

Washiya, Tadahiro; Yano, Kimihiko; Kaji, Naoya; Yamada, Seiya*; Kamiya, Masayoshi

福島第一原子力発電所の燃料デブリ取出し後の処置については、燃料デブリ取出し開始時までにデブリの処置の選択決定に係る一定の議論が必要になるものと想定し、それまでに各シナリオの比較評価に用いる情報や比較評価の進め方を決める必要がある。そのため、本検討では燃料デブリの取出し後の処置シナリオの検討に向けた技術的要件の整理として、各処置シナリオ案の得失評価を行った。評価の結果、総合すると技術課題は有するものの経済性、廃棄物発生量の面で有利なシナリオは長期保管及び直接処分と推定された。一方、安定化処理、湿式処理、乾式処理は経済性、廃棄物発生量の面で不利と推定された。

On March 11, 2011, a severe nuclear accident occurred at Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)'s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (hereinafter called as F1). After the accident, the Council for the Decommissioning was established, mainly by the government and TEPCO, and a road map for the F1 decommissioning was drawn up. In the road map, the fuel debris removal from the reactors is scheduled to launch around 2020. In this study, the characteristics and technological issues of each potential treatment scenario were extracted, and the scenarios were prioritized in advance of formal evaluations in the future. The preliminary evaluation results show that long term storage and direct disposal have more positive aspects in terms of economic efficiency and radioactive waste generation. On the other hand, stabilizing processing, aqueous processing, and pyrochemical processing have been estimated to have more disadvantages in such aspects.

Access

:

- Accesses

InCites™

:

Altmetrics

:

[CLARIVATE ANALYTICS], [WEB OF SCIENCE], [HIGHLY CITED PAPER & CUP LOGO] and [HOT PAPER & FIRE LOGO] are trademarks of Clarivate Analytics, and/or its affiliated company or companies, and used herein by permission and/or license.